2000 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Mazda Drifter
To start off, 2005 Mazda Drifter is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Drifter. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Drifter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Drifter weights approximately 315 kg more than 2000 Ford Falcon.
Because 2005 Mazda Drifter is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Drifter will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Drifter. (245 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Drifter.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Falcon | 2005 Mazda Drifter | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Falcon | Drifter |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4940 cc | 2499 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 21.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1590 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2990 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |
