2000 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (268 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (200 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 209 kg more than 2000 Ford Falcon.

Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (262 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute. 2005 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Falcon 2005 Mazda Tribute
Make Ford Mazda
Model Falcon Tribute
Year Released 2000 2005
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 2965 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 268 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 262 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 10.0:1
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1298 kg 1507 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 62 L