2000 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Isuzu Ascender
To start off, 2006 Isuzu Ascender is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu Ascender (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2000 Ford Falcon. (268 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu Ascender should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu Ascender weights approximately 872 kg more than 2000 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Isuzu Ascender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu Ascender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu Ascender. (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu Ascender.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 2006 Isuzu Ascender | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Falcon | Ascender |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 2170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 95 L |