2000 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Subaru Baja
To start off, 2006 Subaru Baja is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Subaru Baja. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2006 Subaru Baja.
Because 2006 Subaru Baja is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Baja will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Subaru Baja. (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Subaru Baja.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 2006 Subaru Baja | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Falcon | Baja |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 64 L |