2000 Ford Falcon vs. 2008 Mazda 6

To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 79 kg more than 2000 Ford Falcon.

Because 2000 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Falcon (420 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (207 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Falcon 2008 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model Falcon 6
Year Released 2000 2008
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4940 cc 2261 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 270 HP 0 HP
Torque 420 Nm 207 Nm
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 87.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 10.6:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1275 kg 1354 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 132 L 64 L