2000 Ford Falcon vs. 2008 SSC Aero
To start off, 2008 SSC Aero is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 SSC Aero (1,062 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 794 more horse power than 2000 Ford Falcon. (268 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 SSC Aero should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 5 kg more than 2008 SSC Aero.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 SSC Aero (1,357 Nm @ 5800 RPM) has 937 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Falcon. (420 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2008 SSC Aero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Falcon | 2008 SSC Aero | |
Make | Ford | SSC |
Model | Falcon | Aero |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 1062 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 1357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1293 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1090 mm |