2000 Ford Focus vs. 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 2000 Ford Focus is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Focus | 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
| Make | Ford | Willys-Overland |
| Model | Focus | Aero-Willys 2600 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2636 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2740 mm |
