2000 Ford Focus vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2000 Ford Focus is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Ford Focus. (143 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Focus.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Focus. (203 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Focus | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Focus | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2430 mm |