2000 Ford Ka vs. 1959 Saab 92
To start off, 2000 Ford Ka is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ka weights approximately 75 kg more than 1959 Saab 92.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ka | 1959 Saab 92 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Ka | 92 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |