2000 Ford Ka vs. 1966 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2000 Ford Ka is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 TVR Griffith (229 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 TVR Griffith should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ka weights approximately 15 kg more than 1966 TVR Griffith.
Because 1966 TVR Griffith is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 TVR Griffith. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ka | 1966 TVR Griffith | |
Make | Ford | TVR |
Model | Ka | Griffith |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 67 L |