2000 Ford Ka vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Ford Ka is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ka weights approximately 70 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Because 1980 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ka | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ka | 323 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2320 mm |
