2000 Ford Ka vs. 1986 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 2000 Ford Ka is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 2,918 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 840 kg more than 2000 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 (239 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ka | 1986 Jaguar XJ6 | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Ka | XJ6 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2918 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 239 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 12.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2880 mm |
