2000 Ford Ka vs. 1996 Mazda 121
To start off, 2000 Ford Ka is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 121 would be higher. Both 2000 Ford Ka and 1996 Mazda 121 are equipped with a 1,299 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda 121 weights approximately 111 kg more than 2000 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ka (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 121. (103 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ka | 1996 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | 121 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 991 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2460 mm |