2000 Ford Ka vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ka weights approximately 440 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Ka | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Westfield |
| Model | Ka | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2320 mm |
