2000 Ford Ka vs. 2010 Holden Calais

To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 285 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ka. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ka.

Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ka. (105 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ka. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: