2000 Ford Ka vs. 2013 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2013 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ka would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (306 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ka. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1843 kg more than 2000 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Lincoln Navigator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Lincoln Navigator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ka. 2013 Lincoln Navigator has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Lincoln Navigator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Ka | 2013 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Ka | Navigator |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 2723 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2332 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1988 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 106 L |