2000 Ford Laser vs. 1953 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 2000 Ford Laser is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Hornet (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2000 Ford Laser. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 685 kg more than 2000 Ford Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Laser | 1953 Hudson Hornet | |
Make | Ford | Hudson |
Model | Laser | Hornet |
Year Released | 2000 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 4810 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2990 mm |