2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1946 Peugeot 202
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1946 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1946 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 448 kg more than 1946 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1946 Peugeot 202 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Mustang | 202 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1946 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1133 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |