2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1951 Renault Colorale
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Renault Colorale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Renault Colorale would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (130 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1951 Renault Colorale. (45 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1951 Renault Colorale. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Renault Colorale weights approximately 312 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Mustang | 1951 Renault Colorale | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | Colorale |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2383 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 45 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |
