2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1959 Seat 600
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 815 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Mustang | 1959 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Mustang | 600 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |
