2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Rover P5

To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P5 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1963 Rover P5. (119 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover P5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover P5 weights approximately 330 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover P5. (218 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover P5. 1963 Rover P5 has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1963 Rover P5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Mustang 1963 Rover P5
Make Ford Rover
Model Mustang P5
Year Released 2000 1963
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 2993 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 190 HP 119 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 218 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 2650 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.6 mm 77.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 105 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1390 kg 1720 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2820 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 45 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]