2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 368 kg more than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Mustang | 1500 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2430 mm |