2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1964 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 398 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Mustang | 1964 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Mustang | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1188 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2290 mm |
