2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1964 Pontiac Bonneville | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Mustang | Bonneville |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 6375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3130 mm |