2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 413 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (408 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Mustang | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 83 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2380 mm |