2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1967 Steyr 650T
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1967 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 798 kg more than 1967 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (447 Nm) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Steyr 650T. (41 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Mustang | 1967 Steyr 650T | |
| Make | Ford | Steyr |
| Model | Mustang | 650T |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 20 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 2970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1850 mm |
