2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1968 Holden Monaro
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1968 Holden Monaro. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (408 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Monaro. (213 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1968 Holden Monaro | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | Monaro |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 213 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |