2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 Mazda 616
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 388 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (408 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Mustang | 1972 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Mustang | 616 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 83 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |
