2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 Seat 1500
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1972 Seat 1500. (53 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1972 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Seat 1500 weights approximately 12 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1972 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Mustang | 1500 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |