2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 247 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Mustang | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Mustang | Murena |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2156 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 91.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 81.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1051 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4080 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2440 mm |
