2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 476 kg more than 1981 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1981 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Mustang | Reliant |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5409 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1628 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2260 mm |