2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Simca 2 Litres
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 83 kg more than 1981 Simca 2 Litres.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1981 Simca 2 Litres | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Mustang | 2 Litres |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |