2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1981 Skoda L
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1981 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1981 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 473 kg more than 1981 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (408 Nm) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Skoda L. (74 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1981 Skoda L | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Mustang | L |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1044 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 74 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 72 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |