2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 448 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (408 Nm) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | 323 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1071 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 80 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |