2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1982 Mini MK IV

To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1982 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Mini MK IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 596 kg more than 1982 Mini MK IV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (414 Nm) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mini MK IV.

Compare all specifications: