2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1986 Renault Super 5
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault Super 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault Super 5 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1986 Renault Super 5. (41 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Renault Super 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 513 kg more than 1986 Renault Super 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (414 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault Super 5. (66 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault Super 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Mustang | 1986 Renault Super 5 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | Super 5 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 414 Nm | 66 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
