2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1993 Mazda 626

To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (187 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626.

Because 1993 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Mustang 1993 Mazda 626
Make Ford Mazda
Model Mustang 626
Year Released 2000 1993
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3801 cc 1989 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 187 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 60 L