2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1994 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Honda Integra would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Honda Integra (143 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Ford Mustang. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 99 kg more than 1994 Honda Integra.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1994 Honda Integra | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Mustang | Integra |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4525 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |