2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1994 Italdesign Nazca
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Italdesign Nazca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Italdesign Nazca would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1994 Italdesign Nazca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Italdesign Nazca (346 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 2000 Ford Mustang. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Italdesign Nazca should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 296 kg more than 1994 Italdesign Nazca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Italdesign Nazca (470 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Mustang. (447 Nm). This means 1994 Italdesign Nazca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1994 Italdesign Nazca | |
Make | Ford | Italdesign |
Model | Mustang | Nazca |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 346 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 470 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1002 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |