2000 Ford Mustang vs. 1994 Volvo 850
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1994 Volvo 850. (240 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1994 Volvo 850.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (408 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Volvo 850. (407 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Volvo 850.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 1994 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Mustang | 850 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |