2000 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2003 Ford Windstar is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2003 Ford Windstar. (200 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Windstar.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 2003 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | Windstar |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4603 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3066 mm |