2000 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2004 Westfield ZEI is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2004 Westfield ZEI. (174 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield ZEI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 628 kg more than 2004 Westfield ZEI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Mustang | 2004 Westfield ZEI | |
| Make | Ford | Westfield |
| Model | Mustang | ZEI |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2340 mm |
