2000 Ford Mustang vs. 2008 Nissan Terrano
To start off, 2008 Nissan Terrano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Terrano weights approximately 430 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.
Because 2008 Nissan Terrano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Terrano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Terrano. (279 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Terrano.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 2008 Nissan Terrano | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | Terrano |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2664 cc |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.6 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 72 L |