2000 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (260 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (406 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | Cruze |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4603 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 406 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2685 mm |