2000 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Renault Clio

To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 215 kg more than 2010 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Mustang 2010 Renault Clio
Make Ford Renault
Model Mustang Clio
Year Released 2000 2010
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 1460 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 190 HP 81 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 3750 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 1900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.6 mm 76 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 80.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 17.9:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1390 kg 1175 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1710 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 55 L