2000 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Mustang would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 113 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (408 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (155 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Mustang | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Mustang | Cooper |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 155 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.9 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2467 mm |