2000 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Subaru Tribeca

To start off, 2013 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2013 Subaru Tribeca. (252 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2013 Subaru Tribeca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Subaru Tribeca weights approximately 729 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.

Because 2013 Subaru Tribeca is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Tribeca will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (414 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Subaru Tribeca. (335 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Subaru Tribeca.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Ford Mustang 2013 Subaru Tribeca
Make Ford Subaru
Model Mustang Tribeca
Year Released 2000 2013
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4600 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 16 cylinders
Engine Type V electric
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 270 HP 252 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 414 Nm 335 Nm
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1208 kg 1937 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4865 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 2256 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2745 mm