2000 Ford Puma vs. 1946 Jaguar MK IV
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jaguar MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jaguar MK IV would be higher. At 2,663 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Jaguar MK IV is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Jaguar MK IV weights approximately 742 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 1946 Jaguar MK IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Jaguar MK IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 1946 Jaguar MK IV | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Puma | MK IV |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1387 cc | 2663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3060 mm |
