2000 Ford Puma vs. 1947 Nissan Sedan
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Nissan Sedan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Nissan Sedan would be higher. At 1,387 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1947 Nissan Sedan. (14 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1947 Nissan Sedan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 1947 Nissan Sedan | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Puma | Sedan |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1947 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1387 cc | 722 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
