2000 Ford Puma vs. 1948 Nissan Sedan
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Nissan Sedan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Nissan Sedan would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1948 Nissan Sedan. (14 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1948 Nissan Sedan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Puma | 1948 Nissan Sedan | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Puma | Sedan |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1948 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1679 cc | 722 cc |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
